Piercing the Simulacrum:
Of Faux Democracy,
Petty Tyrants, and Painful Realities
Jason Miller
ÒThe ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly
self-administered by its victims. The most perfect slaves are, therefore, those
which blissfully and unawaredly enslave themselves.Ó -- attributed to Dresden James
A caricature of a man who has wrought havoc in virtually
every endeavor throughout his miserable existence has found his calling.
Exuding false bravado and contrived machismo, he has swaggered his way into the
deepest recesses of AmericaÕs collective psyche, fulfilling the inculcated need
for a ÒmanlyÓ patriarch. Chest thumping, bullying, and ultimately unleashing
the Hell of the PentagonÕs death machine upon those brazen enough to resist
conversion to the American Way, King George IV has succeeded the tyrant
American Revolutionaries toppled over 200 years ago.
While the tyrant may be intellectually challenged, his
court is filled with cunning Artful Dodgers like Karl Rove and Dick Cheney.
Conscienceless people for whom guile, deceit, and exploitation are ways of
being write his scripts and pull his strings. But ultimately it is George Bush,
a morally bankrupt cur of a man, who gleefully issues proclamations and decrees
that victimize the working class and the poor of the world. Bullies take such
delight in plying their craft. Yet as vigorously as they have striven to
realize the dream of the US aristocracy and reestablish an overt tyranny, Bush
and his handlers have devoted equal volumes of sweat to maintaining the
illusion that America is a ÒdemocracyÓ.
Buoyed by a virtually omnipresent corporate media equally
dedicated to spiritually and intellectually enslaving the poor and working
class, sacrificing them as cogs in the corporate machine and as cannon fodder,
and relieving them of their hard-earned dollars via irresistible lures of
immediate gratification and an increasingly regressive system of taxation, a
privileged class comprised of the wealthy, intellectual elites, and
well-connected has become the Òpower behind the throneÓ in an oligarchy
disingenuously portrayed as a democracy.
In November of 2003, George Bush assured his constituency
that:
It is no accident that the rise of so many
democracies took place in a time when the world's most influential nation was
itself a democracy.
Serving up an even bigger "Whopper" to a nation
of people conditioned to be addicted to fast food and clever sound bites, Bush
proudly proclaimed in September of 2004:
Because we believe in human dignity, peaceful
nations must stand for the advance of democracy. No other system of government
has done more to protect minorities, to secure the rights of labor, to raise
the status of women, or to channel human energy to the pursuits of peace.
As is true with most concepts, there is no universally
accepted or simple way to capture the meaning of democracy. However, Wikipedia
offers concise definitions of the four fundamental types of democracy:
Direct
democracy is a political system where the
citizens vote on all major policy decisions. It is called direct because, in
the classical forms, there are no intermediaries or representatives.
Representative
democracy is so named because the people select
representatives to a governing body. Representatives may be chosen by the
electorate as a whole (as in many proportional
systems) or represent a particular district or constituency), with some
systems using a combination of the two. Some representative democracies also
incorporate some elements of direct democracy, such as referenda.
Liberal
democracy is a representative democracy (with free and
fair elections) along with the protection of minorities, the rule of law, a separation of
powers, and protection of liberties (thus the name
liberal) of speech, assembly, religion, and property.
Conversely, an illiberal democracy
is one where the protections that form a liberal democracy are either
nonexistent, or not enforced. The experience in some post-Soviet states drew
attention to the phenomenon, although it is not of recent origin. Napoleon for example used
plebiscites to ratify his imperial decisions.
At best, the United States is an illiberal democracy.
Which really is not too surprising. While the Founding Fathers forged a
Constitutional Republic that incorporated many of the values of the Age of
Enlightenment, the government they crafted was largely representative of a
patriarchal society dominated by White male land-owners. Women had no right to
vote, chattel slavery remained legal, the indigenous population was excluded,
and the Bill of Rights was an afterthought that many of the Founders initially
opposed.
George Bush and propagandists who have been intellectually
assaulting US Americans for years would have us believe that the oligarchs
masquerading as democratic leaders have blessed Òthe massesÓ of humanity in the
United States and beyond with unprecedented advances for human rights and
social justice.
Are their claims grounded in reality? LetÕs put them to
the test.
We believe in human dignity. Abu Ghraib certainly reflects the
commitment of the United States government to human dignity. What could be more
dignified than abject humiliation and torture? And to further reinforce the
United StatesÕ resolve to preserve human dignity, the Bush Regime and the Òrepresentatives
of the peopleÓ in Congress recently negated Article Three of the Third Geneva
Convention, Article VI of the US Constitution, and the Eighth Amendment of the
Bill of Rights by legalizing torture.
And letÕs not forget the ÒdignityÓ of state-sanctioned
murder. The United States is one of the very few ÒdemocraciesÓ that has not
abolished the death penalty. In 2003, China, Vietnam, Iran and the United
States accounted for 84% of the worldÕs executions.(1) If one accepts the
corporate media spin on China, Iran and Vietnam, the Òleading democracyÓ is
hanging out with the wrong crowd. Or is there just the tiniest of possibilities
that the United States government engages in oppressive policies too?
Would the US ÒdemocracyÕsÓ governmentÕs protection
of minorities
include the perpetuation of slavery, the execution of abolitionist John Brown,
Jim Crow laws facilitated by Plessy vs. Ferguson, the Native American genocide,
the Japanese Internment, racist drug laws, and lack of response to Katrina?
What would best exemplify the US governmentÕs efforts to
secure the rights of labor? The state-sanctioned murders of Albert Parsons, August Spies, Adolph
Fischer, and George Engel? How about the 26 workers killed (and 172 arrested)
by the National Guard at the Ludlow mining colony? Or the governmentÕs rush to
enforce George Pullman ÒrightÓ to exploit his workforce? Would the Taft-Hartley
Act be a shining example? Perhaps the pompadoured darling of the US aristocracy
and his firing of striking PATCO workers? Maybe it would be the sub poverty
level minimum wage stagnated since 1997? Or the 46 million Americans without
health insurance? Perchance could it be the NLRBÕs recent decision which will
prevent 8 million workers from unionizing? With such a dizzying array of
choices, one can hardly settle on just one.
And how has the worldÕs Òshining beacon of democracyÓ
acted to raise the status of women? Women Suffragists battled long and hard to amend the
Constitution so that women could vote. It only took 130 years of tireless
effort by the people to overcome government obstructions (i.e. the Supreme
CourtÕs Minor vs. Happersett ruling that enabled states to limit suffrage to
men in spite of the Fourteenth Amendment). The Equal Rights Amendment was
conceived in 1923 and is still not incorporated into the US Constitution.
Hiding behind the claim that it would threaten national sovereignty, the US ÒdemocracyÓ
has refused to ratify the international womenÕs bill of rights called CEDAW
(since 1980). In 2002, the nation which has done so much to Òraise the status
of womenÓ accounted for 70% of women murder victims amongst industrialized
countries.(2) While women have outnumbered men throughout most of its history,
the United States is one of the few developed nations where a woman has not
served as head of state and currently only 15.1% of the US Congress is
female.(3)
According to Bush and his script-writers, the nation from
which democracy bubbles forth like pure water from the mouth of a spring has
done more to channel human energy to the pursuits of peace than any other system
of government. Given
the magnitude of that deception, Orwell would probably have identified it as
Quadruplespeak. With 5% of the EarthÕs human population, the United States
accounts for half of the worldÕs war expenditures. Over 100 countries are
subjected to the ÒbenignÓ presence of US military bases. The US is home to the
worldÕs largest stockpile of WMDÕs and is the only nation to have unleashed
nuclear weapons on civilian populations. American military intervention led to
the slaughter of anywhere from 250,000 to one million Filipino civilians(4) and
an estimated four million Vietnamese.(5) 200,000 Central Americans died thanks
to the Òpursuit of peaceÓ by the Reagan Regime.(6) Over one hundred thousand
Iraqi civilians are dead thanks to the Bush Doctrine of preemptive war.
Positing the United States as a champion of peace is akin to praising Jeff
SkillingÕs selfless concern for Enron employees and shareholders.
No abundance here
Obviously, democracy is in very short supply in the United
States. And it has been from the nationÕs birth. Even the Constitutional
Republic which the Founding Fathers intended has steadily frayed over time. But
why stop with these examples of the rapidly approaching extinction of the
populist visions of the more enlightened Founding Fathers when there are so
many more?
How democratic is the United StatesÕ income tax system?
Using the oppressive threat of the nearly omnipotent IRS, the federal
government extorts money and spends it according to the whims of a president
placed in office by the Electoral College (or Katherine Harris and Diebold) and
a Congress rife with members so beholden to corporations that they donÕt dare
cross their patrons by truly representing votersÕ interests. Riddled with
loopholes, tax laws too complex for a Cray supercomputer to decipher enable
corporations and the wealthy to shelter their income from taxation in a
multitude of ways. And the federal tax burden is increasingly shifting onto the
backs of working class people. Between 1977 and 2003, the percentage of tax
revenues collected from corporations fell from 14.4% to 7.7% while the
percentage derived from payroll taxes rose from 29.9% to 40%.(7)
Ironically, the worldÕs Òleading democracyÓ has the
highest rate of incarceration. As of April of 2005, there were 2.1 million US
Americans under the supervision of the penal system, an increase of 2.3% from
the previous year.(8) China, a nation with four times the population of the
United States and a frequent target of critics of human rights violators, jails
fewer people than the Òparagon of democracyÓ.
Sixty percent of US Americans now oppose the war in
Iraq.(9) As of October 8, 2006, George Bush had a 41% job approval rating(10),
an April Washington Post poll showed that 33% of Americans wanted George Bush
impeached and removed from office(11), and the shocking violations of domestic
and international law by the Bush Regime leave Nixon and Clinton looking like
little leaguers.(12) Yet in the Ògreat democracyÓ, Bush and company continue to
commit mass murder and grand larceny with impunity as they implement an agenda
which favors their aristocratic ÒbaseÓ and exploits most of those they ÒrepresentÓ.
Oppressive legislation advanced by the Bush Cabal and
timorously rubber-stamped by Congress has finally relieved the US plutocracy of
the onerous burden of the Bill of Rights. The Patriot Act and Military
Commissions Act of 2006 effectively torpedo most of the US citizenryÕs
Constitutional protections from the tyranny of its Òdemocratic governmentÓ.
Certainly the United States ruling elite can truthfully
credit themselves for allowing a high degree of free speech. In fact, when their
democratic nature is attacked, their tolerance of free expression by dissidents
is usually their first line of defense. Yet in a nation in which 90% of the
media market is controlled by just six major corporations(13) and where a
majority of the inhabitants are bribed and conditioned to reflexively reject
challenges to the ÒAmerican WayÓ as products of irrational minds, godless
Communists, spoiled whiners, or terrorists, how much does Òfree speechÓ
actually contribute to true democracy? While dissenting messages do win some
hearts and minds, they are usually drowned out by a blaring chorus of
mind-numbing corporate media reassurances that the United States is GodÕs gift
to humanity that is incapable of wrong-doing.
Yes, democracy in the United States is but a pleasant
fiction that never existed. And with the passage of time, it has become more of
an unattainable fantasy than a dream to be realized.
What to do?
It is unlikely that a significant number of people in the
United States will find the motivation to pierce the simulacrum until they have
experienced severe hardship or pain. Many US Americans are not even aware that
their enslaved psyches condemn them to an existential hell of spiritual
vacuousness, blind loyalty to a ruthless empire, and obsessive devotion to a
predatory economic system. And many of those who do become aware donÕt care as
long as they can continue to relish heaping portions of fat-laden addictive
repasts from the ubiquitous Golden Arches, to intellectually gorge themselves
with the brain candy eagerly proffered by the corporate media as propagandistic
seeds sown into the rich soil of otherwise fallow minds, to make Faustian
bargains with Visa to adorn their walls with plasma televisions of elephantine
proportions , and to drive urban assault vehicles capable of transporting small
armies and ensuring that they will dominate the road.
Given humankindÕs United States-led pursuit of
self-destruction, an economic, ecological, or humanitarian cataclysm is
virtually inevitable at some point. However, there is a silver lining. The
survivors who rise from the ashes like the mythical Phoenix will be blessed
with a second chance. And letÕs hope those Founding Parents will have the
wisdom to remake civilization according to truly democratic, just, and humane
principles.
Sources:
(1) http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761570630_3/Capital_Punishment.html
(2) http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/press/releases/press04172002.html
(3) http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/Facts.html
(4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_American_War
(5) http://www.vietnam-war.info/casualties/
(6) http://www.consortiumnews.com/1999/052699a1.html
(7) http://zmagsite.zmag.org/Images/rasmus1105.html
(8) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4481261.stm
(9) http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/08/09/iraq.poll/
(10) http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm
(11) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_immigration_041006.htm
(12) http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=127726
(13) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_of_media_ownership
Jason Miller
is a wage slave of the American Empire who has freed himself intellectually and
spiritually. He writes prolifically, his essays have appeared widely on the
Internet, and he volunteers at a homeless shelter. He welcomes constructive
correspondence at willpowerful@hotmail.com
or via his blog, Thomas Paine's Corner, at http://civillibertarian.blogspot.com/.